Thomas S. Kidd, on the tension that has always existed within evangelicalism between the “establishmentarian impulse” and the more activist/reformist impulse:

Evangelicals have been most faithful to their tradition when protesting against manifest injustices like slavery rather than trying to impose a de facto or de jure establishment. Attempts to ban Sunday mail delivery, the sale of alcohol, and the teaching of evolution all reflected that establishmentarian impulse. This impulse has routinely taken evangelicals away from their dissenting roots. Well-meaning (or crassly opportunistic) politicians have often led rank-and-file evangelicals into such establishmentarian efforts. Some of those politicians (such as [William Jennings] Bryan) have been evangelicals, some not. But the establishmentarian crusade of the early 1920s culminated in Bryan’s sensational collapse at the 1925 Scopes “Monkey Trial.” Promoting anti-evolution laws was one of the most misguided evangelical ventures ever because it focused so much energy on mandating a particular Christian view of science in public schools. The Scopes Trial was a major precedent for the crisis of politicization that bedevils evangelical Christians today.

Brad East, with an intriguing comment in the midst of his review of Ryan Burge’s new book:

As for how Christians should respond to this fresh mission field, that is the question of the hour. If any tradition could make serious inroads with working-class young men and two-shift single moms, that mythical American phenomenon—revival—would surely be afoot.

This post (via @Jonah) is spot on: Another Bible Study Night Will Fix It… Really???? It’s ludicrous to think that more church programming and structured gatherings will lead to the kind of organic outcomes that many of us are striving for. In discipleship (as in so much of life), the means and the ends are so closely related that it’s nearly impossible—and certainly inadvisable—to try to pull them apart.

Finished reading: The Big Relief by David Zahl šŸ“š

I don’t know if there’s a person writing at the moment who’s better at “popularizing”—meant in the best possible sense—rich theological concepts and making them intellectually and emotionally digestible than David Zahl. Some part of The Big Relief would catch any person up in its net eventually, if they let themselves be caught.